Duration 26:1

5G Truther Wants To Debate Sam

by The Majority Report w/ Sam Seder

80 035 watched

0

2.6 K

Published 1 Aug 2023

Sam takes a caller who wants to discuss tinfoil theories about health risks posed to humans by 5G, WiFi, Bluetooth, and other technology. Watch the Majority Report live Monday–Friday at 12 p.m. EST on YouTube OR listen via daily podcast at http://www.Majority.FM https://www.house.gov/representatives/find-your-representative https://www.senate.gov/senators/senators-contact.htm #SamSeder #EmmaVigeland #MajorityReport #politics #news #progressive #leftist #democrats #liberal SUPPORT the show by becoming a member: http://www.jointhemajorityreport.com/ Download TMR's FREE app: http://www.majorityapp.com TMR MERCH: http://www.shop.majorityreportradio.com CHECK OUT MORE from the MR crew: Matt Binder DOOMED /MattBinder Brandon Sutton DISCOURSE https://www.patreon.com/ExpandTheDiscourse Emma Vigeland ESVN /ESVNShow Matt Lech LEFT RECKONING /LeftReckoning OTHER LINKS: Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/themajorityreport Facebook: http://facebook.com/MajorityReport Twitter: http://twitter.com/MajorityFM Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/majorityreport.fm/

Category

Show more

Tags

Sam Seder

Majority Report

Emma Vigeland

Matt Lech

Politics News

Democrat

Liberal

Progressive politics

Left politics

Seder Majority

Comments - 991

@

@pearltothejam8 months ago A pro gun control, anti israel, 5g truther is such a rare combo. This has gotta be a bingo. 252
@

@quackaholicsanonymous72109 months ago Why is it always, " sam, i love you, i am on your side, i love what you say! " is a foreruner to a really terrible take? 350
@

@EvilJawa9 months ago Does he sleep in a faraday cage? And he of course can' t walk in the daylight, because of ionization. So my belief is this guy is secretly a vampire, and wants a more vampire friendly world. 71
@

@sticki_9 months ago When these people talk to us about the dangers of 5g and wi-fi, we should be encouraging them wholeheartedly to stop going on the internet. 437
@

@AstroXeno8 months ago Back when i was a kid, the older generation believed we got radiation from sitting too close to a color tv. 19
@

@thirdagainstthewall8 months ago Caller: " i' vesome philosophy courses. "
me: i' ve gotta go. " 68
@

@thejosh38669 months ago Just off the top, governments can make laws that are not based on sound science. It happens all the time. The existence of these bans does nothing to prove wifi is harmful. 363
@

@Wise_That8 months ago As emma points out, almost all the studies he cites are about banning kids using phones in class. Like, because kids were making calls and texting and . ...Expand 39
@

@raymonds.90218 months ago Him choosing not to answer the question shows an inability to say i dont know, this presents a lot of problems in determining truth. 42
@

@LiamRproductions8 months ago Really nice of chuck mcgill to call in. 23
@

@stinkybojangles41288 months ago Watching sam & emma' s physical reaction to these bozos is my favorite part of these debates. 211
@

@54tisfaction8 months ago His only relevant argument was that some european countries had removed wifi from certain public places, like schools. What he didn' t seem to realise . ...Expand 54
@

@alejandroyanez56859 months ago Emma has a sunburn probrably caused by wifi. 40
@

@politicaltroll89209 months ago Thank you for everything you do, its really important. Goes on to a full on take the towers down nowinsane rant. 74
@

@nosuchthing89 months ago The caller doesn' t even understand that non ionizing radiation includes sunlight. 162
@

@jeffreycarman21859 months ago European Union regulations are all based on a prove it is safe before it is a llowed to cause exposure model versus the US regulations are typically based on a reactive model exemplified by we have found it to be unsafe, so well prohibit its usage. While electromagnetic fields may be damaging, and there is not enough substantial evidence to say it definitively and perfectly safe, it does not mean that it is unsafe (and there just isnt a lot of concrete evidence to say its a very serious hazard either).
Risk reduction is awesome, and if something that might pose a harm can be prevented from harming people we should do that unless it poses some more realizable risk to not do it (like it might be more risky, harmful, or inconvenient to not have electricity in houses and hospitals, than the risk of the EM radiation poses). But that also doesnt mean that EM radiation is also definitively bad for us. .. ...Expand 12
@

@petew53998 months ago Sam: moving to the country. Gonna eat a lot of peaches
caller: that poison will kill you faster than bluetooth. 6
@

@ScottDaniels19778 months ago I tried to look up some of the studies and info that this caller stated, but they only lead me to anti-5g websites. Shocking. 44
@

@LuigiMordelAlaume8 months ago "I can understand why my cohosts and colleagues get mad at me."
Did they pick a caller more longwinded than Sam on purpose? 12
@

@mikeh.19169 months ago My ears perk up when i hear my area code. Then he proceeds to jump into 5g conspiracy crap. 21
@

@profroe9 months ago I expected the caller to launch into 5g in the vaccinesto say the least. 26
@

@leafyrox9 months ago Gave him more time than he deserves. In the meantime, our water supplies all have pfas, which seems like a more serious problem than something that could seriously though, i remember there was a study decades ago about mobile phones causing brain tumors. It seems like some studies would have revealed something about that by now. ...Expand 40
@

@soyborne.bornmadeandundone13429 months ago He almost defeated sam by putting sam to sleep. Defeated me that way that' s for sure. 25
@

@Duke000089 months ago This was just after a seperate rough 20+ minute call about ukraine, the collective groan in the chat as he kept going on. 55
@

@KaoticVibes9 months ago I got 99 problems, but wifi ain' t one of them. Goddamn. Someone smart talked about political priorities and what it says about you and this caller embodies that point perfectly. 18
@

@fredericomolina16929 months ago Caller tried to appeal to sam' s ethos by bringing up sam' s friend who committed suicide. Disingenuous af. 113
@

@critapocalypse18368 months ago Can' t wait for the tooken trilogy. 7
@

@Bozeman429 months ago Holy fuck, there' s this type of person that just refuses to answer direct questions. 44
@

@derspook89698 months ago My mother is a lot like this caller, just far more delusionalthis was depressing. Im glad im in the minority, because people like me will never find id="hidden10"amusement in this. These people are sick, and our entire system failed them. Propagators of this dangerous hooey like rfk, joe rogan, andreas kalcker, etc should be fined into oblivion. ...Expand 36
@

@christopherholder99259 months ago As somebody who lives in australia, i definitely question the inclusion of australia in his list of countries lowering or reducing 5g/wi-fi coverage. 96
@

@gayasparagus8 months ago As a 2 way radio technician, this is a fun subject for me. According to the fcc, normal ground-level exposure from cellular towers is much less than the the answer to sam' s question is, yes. Rf exposure damage is cumulative. And uv is non-ionizing radiation, which is why people can get skin cancer from sun bathing a lot.
rf exposure has been extensively researched and exposure from consumer devices and commercial antennas is extremely restricted by the fcc. Contrary to intuition, thats one reason there are cell phone towers everywhere. The power your cellphone puts out is maybe 200mw. Which is very low, requiring a tower to be within 2 miles or closer to get a marginally reliable signal. ...Expand 22
@

@fskate28 months ago As someone who worked in the rf emission regulation industry, there are a lot of people like this. I' ll try to explain the essentials for those who . ...Expand 5
@

@Heinrich_Von_Schnellfahrer8 months ago More people have died from tiktok alone than from exposure to wifi, bt and 5g. 6
@

@idontwantahandlethough8 months ago Ugh. This is why education is important. If this dude had a solid educational foundation, he' d have known enough about physics, or biology, or chemistry, . ...Expand 14
@

@eworr8 months ago Ah, ok, matt has corrected himself - knew he wouldn' t disappoint! 7
@

@roc81799 months ago Wifi operates at frequency of 2. 4ghz which is 12. 5cm wavelength which does not affect the human body in any significant way. We have had wifi tech for . ...Expand 9
@

@Brinelious9 months ago Doctors are the ones that use mri and x-ray machines. But there is a risk/benefit cost involved. The risk of low grade exposure is negligible compared to the positives of the technology. 11
@

@ThisSteveGuy9 months ago I sure hope this guy doesn' t own or ever use a microwave. 21
@

@TreesRaccoonsAndPizza8 months ago I live for sam debating anyone. It brings me joy! 4
@

@auntypha59588 months ago Mans cites dozens of studies, then all he can do to defend his position is essentially repeat the same sentence. 3
@

@Krushak88888 months ago Don' t forgot when people blamed microwaves to cause cancer lol. 6
@

@NicholasSeamans9 months ago Tbh this phone call made me want to " die suddenly" from my covid shots. As soon as he was laying the gun violence heavily i knew he was buttering everyone up. 59
@

@AtariBorn9 months ago And yet, the life expectancy of people in the civilized world has continued to rise, since the discovery and use of fm signals. 12
@

@kait29728 months ago Somebody get this guy a wristband. Problem solved. 4
@

@connor36508 months ago Rip to all those who tried to debate sam. 4
@

@JohnCremboz8 months ago Belgium didn' t ban the sale of smartphones to children under 7. Belgium banned certain phones marketed to children under 7 in september 2013. So, like just to put this myth to bed. ...Expand 4
@

@davec14068 months ago "The Nether Places" is my new favorite term for The Netherlands @
@

@PoeInTheDitch8 months ago Seder: this? Where are you calling from? "
caller: " this is mathew? "
oh, man. The first words out of his mouth sound like he' s asking strangers if he got his own name correct. This can only get worse. ...Expand 3
@

@duncanbmc9 months ago Why do cookers just make up crap about australia?
a) we invented wifi
b) wifi and mobile usage here is endemic and 5g uptake is huge (partial because our broadband is mediocre) 7
@

@ronthorn39 months ago Hes from portland, he has the same area code as me. 3
@

@TheGamingDandy8 months ago He didn' t seem so bad, his concern was at least genuine even if misguided. Seems like he agrees with sam on most stuff. 3
@

@edricaldones96398 months ago Sam has such fun demolishing these fatuous non-arguments. 16
@

@kcolonelx61819 months ago Next time call into bret weinstein or glen beck. 20
@

@brandonbarnett16588 months ago I sure hope this guy is calling from a landline while hes getting his info from his hardwired (only) computer to rattle off at sam. 1
@

@TheNewblade19 months ago I swear i ask myself everyday " why are ppl like this" tbh i stole it from hasan) i just found out my older cousin is a conspiracy theorist id="hidden21" (which was cool cause we never really had anything to bond over) but of course it' s the nwo, 5g, project blue beam types. ...Expand 8
@

@gabrielmccray34578 months ago As someone in the rf field. There' s more danger in holding a cell phone to your head than 5g. Use bluetooth if you' re worried about that. But it' s still fairly minimal. 1
@

@ComradeCatpurrnicus9 months ago I think sams face in the thumbnail says it all. Appealing to " overall health" problems when saying something is harmful isn' t how you convince . ...Expand 5
@

@Dradeeus8 months ago I think what they really want to say is that this stuff is metaphysically tainted on their very, hyper-specific frequencies, so it doesn' t need to also, a case study in motivated reasoning when he preemptively declares that the fcc are either a trustworthy citation or complete liars depending on what conclusion they came to, that he never followed up on. ...Expand 2
@

@mgm88229 months ago So what is the medical condition he is alleging is caused by wi-fi? Bad stuff? Then what stuff, cancer, other diseases? 4
@

@mito888 months ago Sunshine consists primarily of radiation in infrared (ir) visible, and ultraviolet (uv) frequencies.
lasers also emit em radiation in these " optical the higher frequencies of em radiation, consisting of x-rays and gamma rays, are types of ionizing radiation. ...Expand 1
@

@korpsofkreig13595 months ago I know it was a 5g based convo, but their discussion non ionizing & ionizing radiation effects on the body almost made me yell at my phone.
@

@yasminesteinbauer85658 months ago The organizations cited do not say thatradiation from wifi and mobile phones harms us, but only that they cannot rule out 100% that there is no risk. From this they draw the conclusion that you should avoid exposure to it if you don' t have to. For example, they don' t say that you shouldn' t have a cell phone, but only that you shouldn' t put it next to the bed where you sleep, for example. ...Expand 1
@

@ScoothofWrathchild8 months ago So many of these calls are the caller rambling for 10 minutes then sam asks one question and the person falls apart. 10
@

@jzilla12348 months ago Matthew is unsure about his is own name. " my name is matthew? " 2
@

@kerseyHarding8 months ago I work with people who have personality disorders and i do have to say that i see a lot of similarities between that caller and people i' ve worked . ...Expand 1
@

@DarkPuppy98 months ago Where does he get this info on who' s reducing or considering reduction of these technologies? Cause i can' t find it.
@

@galvanaut71198 months ago " non-ionizingwow, so basically everything in the world. 2
@

@tim31729 months ago Other non-ionizing emr:
am radio
fm radio
hd d="hidden28" radio
satellite radio
sound itself
light itself
satellite tv
the sun
the moon
flying
many of these are many, many times the level of wifi and cellular and nobody cares because, for the 947th time. It' s understood to be safe at levels farabove what the maximum output of routers and the radiation from cell towers are.
i do love some of the proposedto theby some of these people:
" limit your child' s screen time to limit
(bruh, the device contributes very little to emr exposure and you' re still subjected it as long as the router is on.
" turn your devices off when not in use. "
" get your child tested for emr exposure
(i don' t believe such a test exists? It doesn' t seem to.
i did appreciate how quickly the caller folded and got defensive, though.
a total crash and burn at the first question and total" i just heard about the case, i didn' t follow it! ". ...Expand 3
@

@taranullius92218 months ago " i' ve tooken some philosophy classes" is an interesting opener. Let' s see how this turns out. 1
@

@coosoorlog8 months ago Another thing. Of course the proposals in various countries onsmart phones from kids or not having wifi at schools etc. Have nothing to do with 5g or any consideration about radiation but they don' t have much to do with studies of how smart phone usage influences mental development either. The are all about smart phone usage in schools, in classrooms, during classes. The one in finland, by the way, is probably not going anywhere since schools and teachers already have tools to mitigate problems and a legislative solution wouldn' t be sensible and would probably end up complicating things and working against digitalisation efforts and recent pedagogical reforms. ...Expand 1
@

@robmckennie42038 months ago This guy is pretty smart, he' s tooken philosophy classes you know. 2
@

@argenieuwenhuijzen25578 months ago I live in the netherlands, i have heard that schools in belgium and france have banned mobile phones in the classroom. But that has all to do with teachers dont want their pupils being distracted.
@

@LeTrashPanda8 months ago Oh dear god. They are coming for our microwave ovens.
@

@catherinecox5738 months ago This is so hard to listen to how did sam' s head not pop? Mine would have. The stupidity actually physically hurts. 3
@

@dankprole78848 months ago longest 5 seconds of this man's life 1
@

@alexkats308 months ago I can certainly see a day in the future were there are no lines any more, everything is connected via wifi and the networks all around us maybe constantly . ...Expand 1
@

@mikek36588 months ago Lmao the tin foil people never realize that they' re the tin foil people. They think they' re the smartest person in the room. 2
@

@alterego60758 months ago Once we figure out how to space travel at the speed of 5g, we' ve hit the peak.
light is dumb.
lol wtf.
@

@mattburgess56978 months ago Its interesting that theyre always bringing up what countries legislate. Because countries always legislate on the basis of sound science. 1
@

@brianisbs7 months ago Watching this on wifi using my bluetooth headphones while on hold through my 5g phone. Oh no!
@

@furniture78518 months ago Theres always a guy like this in philosophy classes, and they are always a massive whinging, cringey mess. 11
@

@NeoRipshaft8 months ago Visible light doesn' t containnon-ionizing radiation - it is non-ionizing radiation. 1
@

@pangea028 months ago What an enigmatic debate lord truly fascinating. Would love to hear his thoughts on the pfas chemicals and carcinogens we' re (more) exposed to on a daily basis vs. Thedangers of 5g and wifi.
@

@Hotlog698 months ago You can tell when someone takes this so personally. Don' t make it your belief.
also, said he came prepared but was woefully unprepared. 1
@

@GeraLares8 months ago Watching debates like this makes me miss michael' s background cackle a lot. 1
@

@ciaranhughes70898 months ago I' ve owned a mobile since pay as you go. I' ve attended at least one gig every year since that had 10s of thousand of people (with mobiles) all that radiation still hasn' t made me a mutant. 3
@

@brian1778 months ago This is one of those things where i am okay being agnostic, and the proof will be in the pudding - the pudding, in this case, being brain tumours. if no tumours, then no concern. If tumours, then concern. Time will tell us for certain. ...Expand 1
@

@beansnrice3219 months ago &min in and sam' s asking a simple question and the troll on the horn is starting to growl liek he' s feral. Yup, coulda predicted that ten seconds into the call, lol. 1
@

@KoRntech8 months ago As an amateur radio operator the output of the consumer wifi and our mobiles is tiny most 100milliwatts with a maximum of 1 watt, in the ism bands like . ...Expand 1